My friend Timothy just landed a gig that's going to entail a LOT of travel, and he's serious about finding some luggage that won't let him down. There are a ton of options/form-factors/bag-types for what he needs to get done, but the one piece that will have to be in the mix is a carry-on sized bag. 

Coincidentally, Burton Snowboards just relaunched their sites in the past day or two, and because I've got several Burton and Gravis bags, I wanted to pass along a recommendation from the current product lines(s) to my friend who needs a bag.
Imagine my disappointment when comparing the product page for the Red Oxx carry-on bag that my friend is getting serious about with the product pages for similar products from Burton and Gravis.
Vastly different page-level information architecture and merchandising strategies here... why is Oxx so much better than Burton/Gravis?
How do we account for the difference in pagelevel IA and merchandising strategy between these brands? They're both manufacturers. Both allow you to "add to cart" from the product page. Maybe it's because Burton and Gravis have a gazillion other retailers to tell their story and do their merchandising for them? If my blog weren't broken, I'd ask you to chime in with a comment. Email me (dan dot klyn at gmail dot com) if you have any thoughts about this tale of two manufactu-retailers...

My name is Dan Klyn, and I'm an information architect.
I work with amazing people at a nonprofit company called Flannel in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
I also teach IA in the library science programs at the University of Michigan and at Wayne State University.